|
Abstract of PhD
This study is about coherence in
communication. Its primary contribution, and where it deviates from much other
work in this area, is that its focus is voice, and our ability to effectively
use this complex instrument in an organisational context. The research reflects
my rather unusual background of both opera performance and leadership
development. It challenges our perceptions and ineffective habitual patterns
with respect to voice, which are frequently the result of body stresses, are
inextricably linked to the emotions, and are impacted by our relations one with
another.
The research was a work of translation and
interpretation, given that voice is a complex holistic phenomenon, a product
(i.e. sound) which is invisible, made from a place of the body we can not see
(larynx) or sometimes feel, linked to both emotional and physical responses, and
with an output we hear differently to those around us, the study of which is
contributed to by at least thirty-six fields, for which no generalized,
multi-layered model or theory exists. Singing, within that, plays a lead role in
the exploration as it takes centre stage, asserting its role as an innate
phylogenetic predisposition of all people; a tonality, lens and touch through
which all life is comprehended.
Beginning with the deconstruction of the
vocal professions through a conversation with the literature, I discover a
‘broken’ tradition, holding the essence of contribution, but hindered by the
social assumptions of Bel Canto, by the deeply entrenched divisions between
vocal professions, by an ignorance of singing within them, by stifling
positivist research and conflicting ethical foundations.
The task of reconstruction of the coherent
self involved a trans-disciplinary application of experiential techniques for
people for whom none of the professions were intended, piecing together the
critical components of a new practice, in which I attempt to be fully inclusive,
borrowing from the shattered fragments, tethered by none and detached from a
single-minded concern for technical considerations.
As my understanding and practice developed,
my thinking metamorphosed beyond an education steeped in positivist thinking to
an interpretivist reflection of my growing awareness of voice as a truly complex
phenomenon, considered through an integrated approach incorporating heuristics
and hermeneutics.
During the task of reconstruction, I
gradually became aware of four ‘aspects’ of communication which must be
comprehended if voice is to be properly understood and “used” in real-life
situations. I began to realise that voice (as a medium) worked within its
context, expressing content, with emotional impact (or lack
thereof) and that all this occurred in relation between self and other.
Thus, the work of this research was evoking the fullness of voice, mediating
between the singer’s intention and the listener’s receptivity in one integrated,
coherent interaction. I found that the emergence of coherence in
communication entailed the consideration of voice holistically, healing the
broken connections between body and voice and experiencing them through the
whole spectrum of sensual awareness.
I discovered that many of us are hindered by
the psychic-vocal-prison of our culture, and further restricted by the
solitary-vocal-confinement of our organisational context, in which vocal
discovery is antithetical to the dominant visual, patriarchal and linear
thinking ~ which reinforces poor habitual patterns and works against coherence.
I consider the complex and bewildering role of emotions in vocal development and
explore the impact of relational imbalances between self and other that lead to
a lack of coherence of communication.
The work has been challenging,
psychologically uplifting, physically invigorating and creatively rejuvenating
and, together with my research participants’ voices, my voice re-developed as I
grew side by side with them, adopting the role of perpetual beginner on a
journey of mutual enquiry and discovery.
|